Will new fed guidelines force companies to hire more employees with criminal pasts?

Published February 23, 2013

| FoxNews.com


Employers could be pressured to hire more workers with a criminal background  under recent guidelines issued by the federal government.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s guidelines warn businesses  about rejecting minority applicants who have committed a crime and recommend  they eliminate policies that “exclude people from employment based on a criminal  record.”

The EEOC says civil rights laws already prohibit different treatment for job  applicants who are of a different ethnic background but have identical criminal  histories. The update was issued out of concern that employers might  disproportionally exclude minorities from getting hired because more African  Americans and Hispanics are getting arrested and going to prison, according to  the guideline report.

But businesses and even one EEOC commissioner strongly objected to the  changes, saying they are confusing and go beyond the commission’s  authority.

“The only real impact the new guidance will have will be to scare business  owners from ever conducting criminal background checks,” said Commissioner  Constance Barker, who cast the lone nay vote and was one two George W. Bush  appointees on the Democrat-controlled commission at the time. Agency  commissioners approved the report in a 4-1 vote in April 2012.

Though the percentage of working-age Americans with a criminal record has  increased significantly over the past 20 years, African Americans and Hispanics  are arrested two to three times as much compared with the rest of the U.S.  population, the report states.

The commission report also states that businesses that continue to use  background checks, in spite of the recommendation, should limit their inquires  to criminal records related only to the open job.

The guidance is not legally binding, but the commission will use it as a  basis of enforcing discrimination claims.

Barker, nominated by former President George W. Bush in 2008 and nominated  for a second term by President Obama in 2011, said failing to get public input  on the hastily compiled final report before voting showed an “utter and blatant  lack of transparency.”

She also said the EEOC’s major shift in guidance from the past 22 years had  “far exceeded its authority as a regulatory commission.”

Though ex-convicts seeking work are not protected under Title VII of the 1964  Civil Rights Act, the EEOC guidelines suggest that rejecting applicants because  of their criminal record is not enough.

Instead, businesses must also prove the criminal history would exclude an  applicant from a specific job or duties and consider such factors as how long  ago the crime was committed.

The guidance tells businesses “they are taking a tremendous risk” by running  such checks, Barker added.

The report also says federal law preempts state laws, including ones that  would prohibit hiring ex-convict for some jobs, such as home health-care  workers. So if companies reject a minority with a criminal history for the  health-care job, for example, they now face a potential discrimination suit  under Title VII.

“It’s very, very confusing,” said Kevin Connell, chairman of the Florida-base  employment and tenant screening company AccuScreen.com. “You could be doing  everything in your power to follow your own state’s guidance and the EEOC could  still come after you.”

Carol Miaskoff, the commission’s acting associate legal counsel, told  FoxNew.com on Friday that the guidance doesn’t preempt and conflict with all  local laws.

She also disagreed with the argument that the commission has overstepped its  authority.

“Clearly, the four commissioners who voted disagreed and thought it was  within the scope of their authority,” said Miaskoff, adding the commission has  provided such guidance since the 1980s.

Though the commission’s intent appears to be to increase minority hiring, the  impact of the policy changes could have the opposite impact.

Studies published by the University of Chicago Legal Forum and the Journal of  Law and Economics show businesses are much less likely to hire minority  applicants when background checks are banned, as reported by The Wall Street  Journal.

Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/23/new-fed-guidelines-spark-biz-concerns-about-using-background-check-applicants/print#ixzz2Lpp9WDIb

Categories: Societal

Tags: , , , , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: