Article Submissions ( Here )



1. Only article that fit with the site theme as weighted article will be submitted ( Please review ” Why these Articles ” )

2. News Organization and Professional Independent Reports, please e-mail info to

3. Please be patient


3 thoughts on “Article Submissions ( Here )”

  1. This is to inform the general public Male or Female who are healthy and %100 serious in selling their kidney should urgently contact DAVE GRAY HOSPITAL. As we have a lot of patients who are here for kidney transplant, Are you seeking for an opportunity to sell your kidney for money due to financial break down and we shall offer you $110,000USD for your Kidney. My name is Doctor Dave Gray, i am a Nephrologist in India Surgical Hospital. Our hospital is specialized in Kidney Surgery/transplant and other organ treatment, we also deal with buying and transplantation of kidneys with a living and healthy donor. We are located in India. If you are interested in selling your kidney please don’t hesitate to contact us via
    Tel no: 918792604634
    Address: First Flat Pune. P.M. B 207 Maharashtra – India
    Please Note: Internet there are a lot of people with different motive, So Please be

    sincere and truthful we are not kid, this is about saving lives of others. Fraudulent is not accepted please.

    Best Regards.


    From its inception until the appearance of uterine cervical carcinoma (UCC) takes a average of 20-30 years; the research of this vaccine have begun in 2000. It is evident that the scientific efficacy of this new vaccine will be determined the years 2025 – 2030.
    HPV not causes definitely the (CCU); at the onset of this disease involves multiple risk factors, including the suspected HPV, but scientifically is proven by epidemiology and statistics that the sex is what generates this disease. Nix in 100.000 nuns found not any UCC.
    To accept that a virus or a bacteria causes a infection disease must unfailingly fulfill the five Koch’s postulate
    1 – The agent must be present in every case of the disease and absent from healthy.
    2 – The agent must not appear in other diseases.
    3 – The agent to be isolated in pure culture from disease lesions.
    4 – The agent of causing disease in a susceptible animal being inoculated.
    5 – The agent must again be isolated lesions in experimental animals.
    Consequently, HPV not fulfill not any principle of Koch’s postulate. by not meeting this postulate, that is accepted as dogma in medicine, scientifically we must be ensure that the HPV is not the causative agent to the UCC..
    Until May 2013 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Syntem (VAERS) published that the vaccines against the HPV caused only in Unites States 138 muertes and 30020 adverse events; 947 disabled: 12 males, 924 females and 11sex unknown; 4050 advers graves: 106 males, 3883 females and 57 unknown sex; 527 abnormal PAP smears, 214 dysplasia cervical and cervical cancer 214. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System secure that only the !% to 10% are denounced
    The Vaccine efects advers reactions (VAERS) ensures that only complaint between 1% to 10% of the adverse effects produced by this evil vaccine;this figures shown are calculated according to the statements of the VAERS: to 10%.
    Dr. Harper, who contributed to the development of the vaccine by Merck, reports that the vaccine was not investigated in children under 15 years and the vaccine given to children under 11 years is a big public experiment.
    The vaccine was approved to give girls uncontaminated with HPV, Dr. Howenstinc ensures that the women are vaccinated with HPV contaminated, have the possibility to acquire a 44.6% CCU / Howenstine/james170.htm.
    Merck did not disclose that the vaccine was transgenic, the Sane Vax has discovered, which is transgenic because it has been found that the vaccine is contaminated with DNA recombinant vaccine Gardasil (DNArPVH) and has raised its concerns to the president of the FDA Margaret Hamburg. The FDA replied that the vaccine will not cause any damage transgenic
    A vaccinated child was ill with rheumatoid arthritis, which is an autoimmune disease. 24 hours after vaccination and found that the aluminum adhered to DNArPVH, two years after vaccination and in autopsy 6 months after death in a New Zeland girl Jazmine Renata which had recibed this deadly vaccines
    Management time to get market approval of a drug the FDA is at least three years, it is a drug for cancer 15 years, but the authorization Merck had only six months and the European Medicines Agency (EMA in English) only 9 months: To introduce the vaccine are using the marketing of fear
    HPV is ubiquitous; lives in wild and domestic animals, pollute us from birth, is on the doorknobs, on towels, on nails, on fomites, in gloves and specula of gynecologists,. sexual intercourse is not the only means of contamination.
    HPV also lives in the 400 nm outermost of our skin and mucous membranes. ,
    If you live in our skin, our immune system produces cellular and humoral immunity is acquired or that our body is self vaccinatinge by PVHs living on our skin and mucous ..

    Click to access HPVToday007SEAP.pdf

    The PVHs is not distributed uniformly worldwide. It has been found that in Canada HPV 18 only reaches 3%; is more often HPV 31, in my country Peru no studies have determined that HPV types predominate; Gardasil contains 225 mcg. aluminum and Cervarix 500 mcg, that produce the Alzheimer, Parkinson and autism, produce too neurotoxic and immune system disorders (Blaylock 2012) and Polisorbato 80, a powerful contraceptive, that in experimental animals produces sterility, atrophy of the testicles and disturbance organic and funtional of the organs of the reproduction; is carcinogenic and mutagenic; also contains sodium borate considered poison unused in medicinal preparations (NLM)
    Have been discovered to date 200 types of HPV; HPV is not infectious, contagious; the intercourse is not only that the persons is contaminated
    On 22-11-2010 FDA approved Gardasil for males aged 9 to 26 to prevent warts and cancer to the anus, is overkill
    For the reasons from deep Peru Huancayo, I believe that this vaccine is a fraud?, a robbery?, a swindle?, a rough joke?, a crime?, a shame?, a scam?
    The HPV is not scientifically proved for the moment that produce the UCC its effectiveness shall be verified just the years of 2025-2030.
    Dr. Godofredo Arauzo
    E mail:


  3. Paul Thornton,
    Letters Editor
    The Los Angeles Times

    Dear Mr. Thornton:

    RE: Your Oct. 8, 2013 article “On letters from climate-change deniers”

    After acknowledging that you lack the scientific credentials to decide which letters about climate change are not fit to be published, you said you therefore “must rely on experts – in other words, those scientists with advanced degrees who undertake tedious research and rigorous peer review. And those scientists have provided ample evidence that human activity is indeed linked to climate change.”

    You went on to cite the UN IPCC as “a body made of up the world’s top climate scientists”, an assertion that could lead uninformed readers to incorrectly conclude that all of the world’s top climate scientists support the findings of the IPCC. Are you aware that hundreds of reputable climate scientists strongly dispute IPCC’s conclusions? To wit:

    Climate Change Denier
    Former warming alarmist Dr. James Lovelock, one of the world’s foremost climate scientists and father of the Gaia theory, recanted apocalyptic climate claims he made just seven years ago. After admitting that he – and Al Gore – had grossly overestimated global warming, Lovelock said, “The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarming books — mine included — because it [runaway warming] looked clear, but it hasn’t happened. [Earth’s temperature] has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising – carbon dioxide has been rising, no question about that.“ Lovelock’s defection from the alarmist community was nothing more than an intellectually honest response to the scientifically indisputable fact that the accelerated warming trend that began in the early 1980s came to an abrupt pause in 1997, a hiatus that has lasted 17 years.

    Climate Change Denier
    As Director of Energy Research for the U.S. Department of Energy, Princeton physics professor Dr. William Happer testified before Congress in 1993 that scientific data did not support theories that greenhouse gas emissions posed a danger to the environment, remarks that caused Vice President Al Gore to fire him. “I was told that science was not going to interfere with government policy,” said Happer. His firing sent a chilling message to other scientists in government and academia: dissenting is hazardous to careers. Still a professor at Princeton, Happer has studied the greenhouse effect for more than four decades, and continues to strongly dispute man-made global warming theory. NOTE: Dr. Happer confirmed to me via email that his long-standing position on manmade global warming theory remains unchanged.

    Climate Change Denier
    A co-founder of Greenpeace, Dr. Patrick Moore stated the following during his recent testimony before the Oversight Committee of the Senate Environmental & Public Works Committee: “There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years.” Dr. Moore went on to dispute in the strongest terms IPCC’s contention that the statistical likelihood of man-made CO2 emissions being responsible for such warming is a “95%-100% probability”. A transcript of Moore’s February 25, 2014 testimony is attached.

    Climate Change Denier
    Former warming alarmist Dr. Judith Curry, Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, wrote the following: “At the heart of the IPCC is a cadre of scientists whose careers have been made by the IPCC. These scientists have used the IPCC to jump the normal meritocracy process by which scientists achieve influence over the politics of science and [public] policy. Not only has this brought some relatively unknown, inexperienced and possibly dubious people into positions of influence, but these people became vested in protecting the IPCC.” Curry defected from the pro-warming movement in the wake of the Climategate email scandal that rocked the world of climate science to its foundation. NOTE: Dr. Curry confirmed to me via email that she has no regrets about having switched sides in the debate over anthropogenic global warming theory.

    Climate Change Deniers
    FORTY-NINE astronauts and other scientists who formerly worked for NSASA strongly dispute the agency’s public stance that man’s use of fossil fuels poses an imminent threat to the planet. The group includes marquee names such as Walter Cunningham, Michael Collins and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA’S Johnson Space Center in Houston. The group’s letter to NASA director Charles Bolton, Jr., said, “With hundreds of well-known climate scientists publically declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.”

    Mr. Thornton, even though there are hundreds of other prominent and highly qualified scientists who strongly dispute man-caused climate change theory, I hope the following point has been made: despite repeated claims to the contrary by President Obama, Al Gore and the IPCC, climate science is light-years away from being “settled”. By citing only IPCC scientists to support your climate change letter-publishing policy, you effectively cherry-picked scientific experts who all hold the same view.

    Regarding your policy decision, I ask you this: If climate change deniers James Lovelock, William Happer, Patrick Moore, Judith Curry or any of the forty-nine former NASA astronauts and scientists mentioned above sent a dissenting letter to your paper, would such letters be automatically rejected for publication? I certainly hope not, just as I hope your policy is not an effort to silence legitimate scientific dissent, as opposed to allowing – and encouraging — an unfettered debate over the hotly disputed theory that greenhouse gas emissions are destroying the planet.

    Finally, I know I’m engaging in the most far-fetched kind of wishful thinking by hoping that a member of the mainstream media would publish this correspondence, but I respectfully ask the LA Times to do just that. Murrow would.


    John Eidson
    Marietta, GA


Spam filters are now on...Comments will be held in moderation for a short time prior to posting

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s